PEER REVIEW PROCESS

  1. Each manuscript submitted by the author arrived at the editorial desk by double-blind peer review. 
  2. The editor will examine whether the manuscript has been suitable with writing style format and journal template
  3. The editor will make sure a manuscript covering one of journal scope of topics
  4. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall be not contained copyright infringement and plagiarism
  5. The manuscript that has received editorial acknowledgment will be examined by at least two reviewers.
  6. Reviewers will identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.
  7. The argumentation of the author should be clearly defined, objectively based on methods, and used the scientific process of thinking.  
  8. The editors of the PAMARENDA journals are responsible for deciding which one of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may confer with reviewers in making this decision.
  9. We do hope for great cooperation among authors and reviewers to fulfill the review process based on time (2 weeks - 8 weeks). The changing due date of authors and reviewers will be discussed by editors to decide the time of article publication